翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Johnson (1899)
・ United States v. Johnson (1911)
・ United States v. Johnson (1944)
・ United States v. Johnson (1946)
・ United States v. Johnson (1966)
・ United States v. Johnson (1968)
・ United States v. Johnson (1982)
・ United States v. Johnson (1987)
・ United States v. Johnson (2000)
・ United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 302 (1943)
・ United States v. Jones (2012)
・ United States v. Jones (disambiguation)
・ United States v. Jordan
・ United States v. Ju Toy
・ United States v. Juvenile Male
United States v. Kagama
・ United States v. Kahriger
・ United States v. Kaiser
・ United States v. Karo
・ United States v. Kebodeaux
・ United States v. Keenan
・ United States v. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
・ United States v. Kil Soo Lee
・ United States v. Kilbride
・ United States v. Kincade
・ United States v. Kirby
・ United States v. Kirby Lumber Co.
・ United States v. Kirschner
・ United States v. Klein
・ United States v. Knotts


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Kagama : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Kagama

''United States v. Kagama'', , was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Major Crimes Act of 1885. This Congressional act gave the federal courts jurisdiction in certain cases of Indian-on-Indian crimes, even if the crimes were committed on an Indian reservation. Kagama, a Yurok Native American (Indian) accused of murder, was selected as a test case by the Department of Justice to test the constitutionality of the Act.
The importance of the ruling in this case was that it tested the constitutionality of the Act and confirmed Congress' authority over Indian affairs. Plenary power over Indian tribes, supposedly granted to the U.S. Congress by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, was not deemed necessary to support the Supreme Court in this decision; instead, the Court found the power in the tribes' status as dependent domestic nations. This allowed Congress to pass the Dawes Act the following year. The case has been criticized by legal scholars as drawing on powers that are not granted to Congress by the Constitution. It remains good law, despite that criticism.
==Background==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Kagama」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.